Core Infrastructure Additional Memory Option
Core Infrastructure comes with a predefined amount of Memory, there should be an Option to expand the Core Infrastructure Memory. Basically an AddOn Memory option to be edited for Admins. Reason being that some services might need additional resources to operate smoothly.

szst 9 days ago
Core Infrastructure Additional Memory Option
Core Infrastructure comes with a predefined amount of Memory, there should be an Option to expand the Core Infrastructure Memory. Basically an AddOn Memory option to be edited for Admins. Reason being that some services might need additional resources to operate smoothly.

szst 9 days ago
Core infrastructure OS Disk Space
Core Infrastructure comes with a predefined amount of Storage, there should be an Option to expand the Core Infrastructure OS Disk Storage. Basically an AddOn OS Disk Storage option to be edited for Admins.

szst 14 days ago
Core infrastructure OS Disk Space
Core Infrastructure comes with a predefined amount of Storage, there should be an Option to expand the Core Infrastructure OS Disk Storage. Basically an AddOn OS Disk Storage option to be edited for Admins.

szst 14 days ago
ACME DNS-01 API for automated certificate issuance
As a partner/tenant I want to obtain and renew ACME certificates via DNS-01 using an API-driven challenge against my DNS zones So that I can automate TLS certificate lifecycle for my services, without manually updating DNS records Given a valid API token scoped to a zone I own, when my ACME client requests a challenge, then the AC API creates the _acme-challenge TXT record in the correct zone. Given a completed validation, when my client calls cleanup, then the AC API removes the corresponding TXT record. The API enforces authorization so a token can only modify TXT records in zones belonging to that tenant. The API supports multiple concurrent _acme-challenge TXT values on the same name (required for SAN/wildcard certs). The API exposes an endpoint contract compatible with a common client (eg certbot/acme.sh hooks) Actions are rate-limited and audit-logged per token. Documentation provides a working example (client config + hook script) for at least one supported client. Out of scope: HTTP-01/TLS-ALPN-01 challenges; certificate storage or deployment on customer hosts.

jhuesser about 1 month ago
ACME DNS-01 API for automated certificate issuance
As a partner/tenant I want to obtain and renew ACME certificates via DNS-01 using an API-driven challenge against my DNS zones So that I can automate TLS certificate lifecycle for my services, without manually updating DNS records Given a valid API token scoped to a zone I own, when my ACME client requests a challenge, then the AC API creates the _acme-challenge TXT record in the correct zone. Given a completed validation, when my client calls cleanup, then the AC API removes the corresponding TXT record. The API enforces authorization so a token can only modify TXT records in zones belonging to that tenant. The API supports multiple concurrent _acme-challenge TXT values on the same name (required for SAN/wildcard certs). The API exposes an endpoint contract compatible with a common client (eg certbot/acme.sh hooks) Actions are rate-limited and audit-logged per token. Documentation provides a working example (client config + hook script) for at least one supported client. Out of scope: HTTP-01/TLS-ALPN-01 challenges; certificate storage or deployment on customer hosts.

jhuesser about 1 month ago
Account Expiration Date Option
Option to set expiration date on RDS user accounts in the webinterface. Scheduled account lockout option for partners.

szst about 1 month ago
Account Expiration Date Option
Option to set expiration date on RDS user accounts in the webinterface. Scheduled account lockout option for partners.

szst about 1 month ago
Completed
Note on Optimizing Password Criteria
Please also include the minimum number of characters in this note. For “HostedExchange” as well as in “Core Infrastructure”

sire about 2 months ago
Completed
Note on Optimizing Password Criteria
Please also include the minimum number of characters in this note. For “HostedExchange” as well as in “Core Infrastructure”

sire about 2 months ago
View password criteria
When you enter a password, a message appears saying “that it does not meet the requirements”—but what exactly are the requirements? That should be displayed as well.

Pierre-de-la-Verre 2 months ago
View password criteria
When you enter a password, a message appears saying “that it does not meet the requirements”—but what exactly are the requirements? That should be displayed as well.

Pierre-de-la-Verre 2 months ago
Completed
Unclear line number
In the mailbox overview, the line counts are shown in the lower right corner, for example, like this With 41 mailboxes, it reports 47 lines; either it’s counting some header lines or it’s including the aliases—in this specific case, 39 people plus 8 aliases = 47. This isn’t clear and should be improved.

Pierre-de-la-Verre 2 months ago
Completed
Unclear line number
In the mailbox overview, the line counts are shown in the lower right corner, for example, like this With 41 mailboxes, it reports 47 lines; either it’s counting some header lines or it’s including the aliases—in this specific case, 39 people plus 8 aliases = 47. This isn’t clear and should be improved.

Pierre-de-la-Verre 2 months ago
Private VM IP change
The customer wants the manually assigned IP address of their private VM to be displayed in the AC. Example: The DHCP range starts at x.x.x.100. The private VM automatically receives x.x.x.100 from the AC. The customer changes the automatically assigned IP address to x.x.x.10. The AC should display and use this new IP address, x.x.x.10. Public services added later will therefore not be assigned to x.x.x.10 but rather to x.x.x.100—the address known to the AC—which is unfortunate.

sire 2 months ago
Private VM IP change
The customer wants the manually assigned IP address of their private VM to be displayed in the AC. Example: The DHCP range starts at x.x.x.100. The private VM automatically receives x.x.x.100 from the AC. The customer changes the automatically assigned IP address to x.x.x.10. The AC should display and use this new IP address, x.x.x.10. Public services added later will therefore not be assigned to x.x.x.10 but rather to x.x.x.100—the address known to the AC—which is unfortunate.

sire 2 months ago
Rejected
Custom Port: NAT Rule
The customer would like to be able to enter any custom ports in the DNAT rule. They want to be able to choose the port freely.

sire 2 months ago
Rejected
Custom Port: NAT Rule
The customer would like to be able to enter any custom ports in the DNAT rule. They want to be able to choose the port freely.

sire 2 months ago
Completed
Firewall Rules Destination IP
Could this word be changed to “Destination” Or “IP Address” i think its strange to have two times the word “Source” for Source and Destination IPs.

sire 2 months ago
1.7.8
Completed
Firewall Rules Destination IP
Could this word be changed to “Destination” Or “IP Address” i think its strange to have two times the word “Source” for Source and Destination IPs.

sire 2 months ago
1.7.8
Rejected
Spam Filters and Blocklists
The spam filter should be more flexible to use; specifically: If I want to add something from the spam report to the block list, I’d like to be able to choose whether to add the entire email address or just the domain to the block list. The connection between the blocklists in individual mailboxes and in the central administration should be more open. In most cases, it makes sense to block a spam address that Employee X receives not just for him, but for the entire company.

Pierre-de-la-Verre 4 months ago
Rejected
Spam Filters and Blocklists
The spam filter should be more flexible to use; specifically: If I want to add something from the spam report to the block list, I’d like to be able to choose whether to add the entire email address or just the domain to the block list. The connection between the blocklists in individual mailboxes and in the central administration should be more open. In most cases, it makes sense to block a spam address that Employee X receives not just for him, but for the entire company.

Pierre-de-la-Verre 4 months ago
Rejected
Spam Filter
Possibility to export Allow & Blocklists from user Context and option to import it to another user. i.e. One user fills his blocklist and wants to provide it to his colleague, that just started working with the company.

szst 6 months ago
Rejected
Spam Filter
Possibility to export Allow & Blocklists from user Context and option to import it to another user. i.e. One user fills his blocklist and wants to provide it to his colleague, that just started working with the company.

szst 6 months ago